On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 08:34:43PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Signed-off-by: Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx> No patch description, really? > --- > include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h > index 8c5909c0076c..329fa0b56642 100644 > --- a/include/linux/module.h > +++ b/include/linux/module.h > @@ -186,14 +186,14 @@ extern void cleanup_module(void); > * The following license idents are currently accepted as indicating free > * software modules > * > - * "GPL" [GNU Public License v2] > - * "GPL v2" [GNU Public License v2] > - * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU Public License v2 rights and more] > - * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 > + * "GPL" [GNU General Public License v2] > + * "GPL v2" [GNU General Public License v2] > + * "GPL and additional rights" [GNU General Public License v2 rights and more] > + * "Dual BSD/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 > * or BSD license choice] > - * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 > + * "Dual MIT/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 > * or MIT license choice] > - * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU Public License v2 > + * "Dual MPL/GPL" [GNU General Public License v2 > * or Mozilla license choice] > * > * The following other idents are available Why did you do that? Maybe as justification for your other GPL name expansion fix patches? Anyway, let's see what Linus thinks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
