On 2022/11/15 15:54, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:30:23AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:10:16AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2022/11/14 23:46, Luis Chamberlain wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: >>>>> I'll check on that, meanwhile if we could keep the module argument, >>>>> that'd be great >>>> >>>> As Leizhen suggested I could just drop patches: >>>> >>>> 7/9 livepatch: Improve the search performance of module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol() >>>> 8/9 kallsyms: Delete an unused parameter related to kallsyms_on_each_symbol() >>>> >>>> Then after the next kernel is released this can be relooked at. >>>> If this is agreeable let me know. >>> >>> I'm OK. >> >> sounds good, thanks > > OK thanks, I dropped the last selftest patch as well, and pushed to > modules-next. Leizhen, can you enhance the selftest for the new module > requirement and repost? Okay, right away. > > Stephen, you can drop your fix from linux-next, hopefully there should > no longer be any merge conflicts. The module requirement will stick for > now. > > Thanks, > > Luis > . > -- Regards, Zhen Lei
