Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] livepatch: Improve the search performance of module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2022/11/15 15:54, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 08:30:23AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:10:16AM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2022/11/14 23:46, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 02:26:19PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>>>> I'll check on that, meanwhile if we could keep the module argument,
>>>>> that'd be great
>>>>
>>>> As Leizhen suggested I could just drop patches:
>>>>
>>>> 7/9 livepatch: Improve the search performance of module_kallsyms_on_each_symbol()
>>>> 8/9 kallsyms: Delete an unused parameter related to kallsyms_on_each_symbol()
>>>>
>>>> Then after the next kernel is released this can be relooked at.
>>>> If this is agreeable let me know.
>>>
>>> I'm OK.
>>
>> sounds good, thanks
> 
> OK thanks, I dropped the last selftest patch as well, and pushed to
> modules-next.  Leizhen, can you enhance the selftest for the new module
> requirement and repost?

Okay, right away.

> 
> Stephen, you can drop your fix from linux-next, hopefully there should
> no longer be any merge conflicts. The module requirement will stick for
> now.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>   Luis
> .
> 

-- 
Regards,
  Zhen Lei



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Big List of Linux Books]

  Powered by Linux