On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:12:45AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > Then you have probably missed a huge part of my emails. Please > re-read. If those arguments are not clear, feel free to ask for > clarification. Reducing the whole my reasoning and objections to the > sentence above and calling that vapid and lazy is not only unfair but > also disrespectful. What, where you complained about slab's page allocations showing up in the profile instead of slab, and I pointed out to you that actually each and every slab call is instrumented, and you're just seeing some double counting (that we will no doubt fix?) Or when you complained about allocation sites where it should actually be the caller that should be instrumented, and I pointed out that it'd be quite easy to simply change that code to use _kmalloc() and slab_tag_add() directly, if it becomes an issue. Of course, if we got that far, we'd have this code to thank for telling us where to look! Did I miss anything?
