On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 10:33 AM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-06-11 at 03:32 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > With the previous refactoring,
> >
> > - <asm/export.h> is a wrapper of <asm-generic/export.h>
> > - <asm-generic/export.h> is a wrapper of <linux/export.h>
> >
> > My hope is to replace
> >
> > #include <asm/export.h> --> #include <linux/export.h>
> >
> > for all *.S files.
> >
> > For now, adding a warning in the checkpatch.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -3753,6 +3753,13 @@ sub process {
> > "Avoid using '.L' prefixed local symbol names for denoting a range of code via 'SYM_*_START/END' annotations; see Documentation/asm-annotations.rst\n" . $herecurr);
> > }
> >
> > +# warn if <asm/export.h> is included.
> > +# <asm/export.h> is a wrapper of <linux/export.h>. Please include <linux/export.h> directly.
> > + if ($tree && $rawline =~ m{^.\s*\#\s*include\s*\<asm\/export\.h\>}) {
> > + WARN("INCLUDE_LINUX_EXPORT",
> > + "Please include <linux/export.h> instead of <asm/export.h>\n" . $herecurr);
> > + }
>
> This warns on patch context lines.
> That's not something checkpatch generally does.
>
> Likely this should use /^\+ rather than /^.
>
> And it's nice to have --fix capability
>
> if (WARN("etc...") &&
> $fix) {
> $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\s*#\s*include\s*\<asm\/export\.h\>/#include <linux/export.h>/;
> }
>
> cheers, Joe
I retract this patch series because I realized it was breaking ia64.
Please ignore this patch.
Anyway, your expert feedback about checkpatch.pl
was very appreciated. Thank you.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
