On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:23:25PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote: > module_enable_x() has nothing to do with CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX > allthough by coincidence architectures who need module_enable_x() are > selection CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. > > Enable module_enable_x() for everyone everytime. If an architecture > already has module text set executable, it's a no-op. > > Only check end boundary if CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX is set, and > make sure we entirely get the last page when the boundary is not > aligned. When CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX is not selected, it is not > a big deal to have the start of data as executable. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks! Both patches look good to me! I can merge this once Aaron's then your's and then Michal's KEXEC stuff gets merged. Luis
