Greetings, since commit b7016153ec87dba2b0f0d182cc8f1e3b12f4dfaf building static kmod is disabled. I would like to question that decision. My use case is as follows: I build a custom BSP and would like to provide statically linked host tools. That makes it easy to deploy them at any location, and that these tools do not pick up random shared libraries of the underlying Linux system when executed. Currently kmod is one of the few packages that are not able to build in that way. I understand that you may want to prevent other tools (e.g. sytemd was mentioned in that commit) to link against a static libkmod, and that is fine with me. What I would like to get is static kmod tools. For the BSP host tools case I don't mind if a libkmod does not exist at all, only the tools are of interest. What do you think? Regards, Eike -- Rolf Eike Beer, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11 Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Göttingen, Germany Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen, Amtsgericht Göttingen HR B 3160 Geschäftsführung: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke – Ust-IdNr.: DE 205 198 055 emlix - smart embedded open source
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.