Hi Marco, On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Marco d'Itri <md@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I can provide a patch if needed, but which option(s) should actually be > documented? Just like in modprobe (see --help there)... we have both of them since they were supported in module-init-tools. Lucas De Marchi > > ----- Forwarded message from "Marc F. Clemente" <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ----- > > From: "Marc F. Clemente" <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Bug#687435: kmod: Minor documentation discrepancy > > Package: kmod > Version: 9-2 > Severity: minor > > When I get help from the program with "depmod --help" I get: > -n, --show Write the dependency file on stdout only > > But the documentation "man depmod" says: > -n --dry-run > > All three options work fine and do the same thing, so it's really no big deal. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: wheezy/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) > Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash > > Versions of packages kmod depends on: > ii libc6 2.13-35 > ii libkmod2 9-2 > ii lsb-base 4.1+Debian7 > > kmod recommends no packages. > > kmod suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > ciao, > Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
