On 19.1.2013 00:18, David Howells wrote: > Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> That's not necessarily so. Say, for example, a third party open source >>> vendor like the OpenAFS project released their own signed module to be >>> used against someone else's kernel... >> >> But somebody else's kernel will still only support RSA and X.509 for >> module signatures, won't it? Or are there kernels that also support DSA >> or PGP? > > Sorry, I misread what you wrote. It is possible we might support Elliptic > Curve at some point. So do you think that it makes sense to display the name of the signature algorithm in modinfo? Thanks, Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
