On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Thierry Vignaud <thierry.vignaud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19 September 2012 02:30, Lucas De Marchi > <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Fixing this in hash implementation or hash comparison function is the >>> wrong thing to do. As you noticed, the hash is used for other things >>> too. >> >> I've just made a quick fix. Could you please send me your modules.order, >> modules.alias, modules.dep together with the affected modules (only >> the names are ok). Bonus points for you if you use this information to >> actually create a test in the testsuite :-) > > Here they're. > The module that we failed to detect properly was cciss. > see https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5833 Sorry, I couldn't really test this. Did the patch I sent solve the issue? Your modules.order seems to have been tweaked afterwards because it contains the compressed module names. The patch I sent tries to solve this by indexing the modules by their uncompressed names. Lucas De Marchi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
