> -----Original Message----- > From: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2024年10月30日 21:44 > To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; Bough Chen > <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx>; Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Shawn Guo > <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fabio Estevam > <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mikhail Anikin <mikhail.anikin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jon Nettleton > <jon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; yazan.shhady <yazan.shhady@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Rabeeh > Khoury <rabeeh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dl-S32 <S32@xxxxxxx>; > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mmc: host: sdhci-esdhc-imx: update esdhc sysctl > dtocv bitmask > > Am 30.10.24 um 14:37 schrieb Josua Mayer: > > NXP ESDHC supports setting data timeout using uSDHCx_SYS_CTRL register > > DTOCV bits (bits 16-19). > > Currently the driver accesses those bits by 32-bit write using > > SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL (0x2E) defined in drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h. > > This is offset by two bytes relative to uSDHCx_SYS_CTRL (0x2C). > > The driver also defines ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK as first 4 bits, > > which is correct relative to SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL but not relative to > > uSDHCx_SYS_CTRL. The definition carrying control register in its name > > is therefore inconsistent. > > > > Update the bitmask definition for bits 16-19 to be correct relative to > > control register base. > > Update the esdhc_set_timeout function to set timeout value at control > > register base, not timeout offset. > > > > This solves a purely cosmetic problem. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > > index > > > a830d9a9490408d3148b927bf1acc719a13e8975..101feabb24fb41bd10a2e796f > 4f3 > > f8d4357dc245 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c > > @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ > > #include "sdhci-esdhc.h" > > #include "cqhci.h" > > > > -#define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK 0x0f > > #define ESDHC_CTRL_D3CD 0x08 > > #define ESDHC_BURST_LEN_EN_INCR (1 << 27) > > #define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL 0x2c > > +#define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK GENMASK(19, 16) > > #define ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_IPP_RST_N BIT(23) > > /* VENDOR SPEC register */ > > #define ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC 0xc0 > > @@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ static void esdhc_set_timeout(struct sdhci_host > > *host, struct mmc_command *cmd) > > > > /* use maximum timeout counter */ > > esdhc_clrset_le(host, ESDHC_SYS_CTRL_DTOCV_MASK, > > - esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data) ? 0xF : 0xE, > > + esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data) ? 0x0F0000 : 0x0E0000, > > SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL); > ^^ There is a mistake here, intended: ESDHC_SYS_CTRL (I changed that last > second while writing commit description :( ) Yes, please fix this. Regards Haibo Chen > > } > > > >
