On Thu, 10 Oct 2024 at 08:20, Victor Shih <victorshihgli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:34 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 12:28, Victor Shih <victorshihgli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Victor Shih <victor.shih@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Summary > > > ======= > > > These patches[1] support UHS-II and fix GL9755 and GL9767 > > > UHS-II compatibility. > > > > > > About UHS-II, roughly deal with the following three parts: > > > 1) A UHS-II detection and initialization: > > > - Host setup to support UHS-II (Section 3.13.1 Host Controller Setup > > > Sequence[2]). > > > - Detect a UHS-II I/F (Section 3.13.2 Card Interface Detection Sequence > > > [2]). > > > - In step(9) of Section 3.13.2 in [2], UHS-II initialization is include > > > Section 3.13.3 UHS-II Card Initialization and Section 3.13.4 UHS-II > > > Setting Register Setup Sequence. > > > > > > 2) Send Legacy SD command through SD-TRAN > > > - Encapsulated SD packets are defined in SD-TRAN in order to ensure Legacy > > > SD compatibility and preserve Legacy SD infrastructures (Section 7.1.1 > > > Packet Types and Format Overview[3]). > > > - Host issue a UHS-II CCMD packet or a UHS-II DCMD (Section 3.13.5 UHS-II > > > CCMD Packet issuing and Section 3.13.6 UHS-II DCMD Packet issuing[2]). > > > > > > 3) UHS-II Interrupt > > > - Except for UHS-II error interrupts, most interrupts share the original > > > interrupt registers. > > > > > > Patch structure > > > =============== > > > patch#1-#7: for core > > > patch#8-#20: for sdhci > > > patch#21: for GL9755 > > > patch#22: for GL9767 > > > > Patch 1 -> 6 applied for next, with some minor updates to patch2. > > > > Patch 7 needs some more work, I will comment on that separately. > > > > I am okay with patch 8 -> 22, but since there will be a re-spin for a > > new version, perhaps you can run a new round of checkpatch.pl to see > > if some of the warning that it reports can be fixed too. > > > > [...] > > > > Kind regards > > Uffe > > Hi, Ulf > > I really appreciate your reply and I will resend the new series of > patches before the end of next week. > Do I need to include patch 1 to patch 6 when re-sending the new series > of patches? > Or should patch 7 to patch 22 be sufficient? Hi Victor, Patch 7 to 22 is sufficient. Just rebase the series on top of the mmc-tree's next branch, then you should be good to go. Kind regards Uffe
