Re: [PATCH v7 03/10] mmc: core: Don't use close-ended rw for SDUC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 8 Sept 2024 at 12:22, Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The SDUC spec expects CMD22 to get squeezed between CMD23 and the
> read/write command, e.g. CMD23->CMD22->CMD18 and CMD23->CMD22->CMD25.
> At this early stage of adoption, we want to avoid an amid stream of
> fixes & quirks of bogus hw, that tends to apply extra logic specifically
> around auto-cmd12 & auto-cmd23.
>
> Let's leave close-ended out for now, and re-consider this should those
> cards become ubiquitous, if any.

This makes sense to me. However, for clarity I would also state in the
commit message that it also means that BLK_FEAT_FUA will not be used
for I/O, but instead we will rely on BLK_FEAT_WRITE_CACHE.

>
> Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> index f58bea534004..05a7745c2a68 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> @@ -2547,7 +2547,7 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data *mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card,
>         if (mmc_host_cmd23(card->host)) {
>                 if ((mmc_card_mmc(card) &&
>                      card->csd.mmca_vsn >= CSD_SPEC_VER_3) ||
> -                   (mmc_card_sd(card) &&
> +                   (mmc_card_sd(card) && !mmc_card_ult_capacity(card) &&
>                      card->scr.cmds & SD_SCR_CMD23_SUPPORT))
>                         md->flags |= MMC_BLK_CMD23;
>         }
> --
> 2.25.1
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux