Il 29/09/24 09:44, Andy-ld Lu ha scritto:
Mediatek SoC MT8196 features a new design for tx/rx path. The new tx
path incorporates register settings that are closely associated with
bus timing. And the difference between new rx path and older versions
is the usage of distinct register bits when setting the data sampling
edge as part of the tuning process.
Besides, there are modified register settings for STOP_DLY_SEL and
POP_EN_CNT, with two new fields added to the compatibility structure
to reflect the modifications.
For the changes mentioned in relation to the MT8196, the new compatible
string 'mediatek,mt8196-mmc' is introduced. This is to accommodate
different settings and workflows specific to the MT8196.
Signed-off-by: Andy-ld Lu <andy-ld.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 141 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
index 89018b6c97b9..4254b3012aeb 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@
#define SDC_RESP3 0x4c
#define SDC_BLK_NUM 0x50
#define SDC_ADV_CFG0 0x64
+#define MSDC_NEW_RX_CFG 0x68
#define EMMC_IOCON 0x7c
#define SDC_ACMD_RESP 0x80
#define DMA_SA_H4BIT 0x8c
@@ -91,6 +92,7 @@
#define EMMC_TOP_CONTROL 0x00
#define EMMC_TOP_CMD 0x04
#define EMMC50_PAD_DS_TUNE 0x0c
+#define LOOP_TEST_CONTROL 0x30
/*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* Register Mask */
@@ -202,9 +204,13 @@
#define SDC_STS_CMDBUSY BIT(1) /* RW */
#define SDC_STS_SWR_COMPL BIT(31) /* RW */
-#define SDC_DAT1_IRQ_TRIGGER BIT(19) /* RW */
/* SDC_ADV_CFG0 mask */
+#define SDC_DAT1_IRQ_TRIGGER BIT(19) /* RW */
#define SDC_RX_ENHANCE_EN BIT(20) /* RW */
+#define SDC_NEW_TX_EN BIT(31) /* RW */
+
+/* MSDC_NEW_RX_CFG mask */
+#define MSDC_NEW_RX_PATH_SEL BIT(0) /* RW */
/* DMA_SA_H4BIT mask */
#define DMA_ADDR_HIGH_4BIT GENMASK(3, 0) /* RW */
@@ -226,6 +232,7 @@
/* MSDC_PATCH_BIT mask */
#define MSDC_PATCH_BIT_ODDSUPP BIT(1) /* RW */
+#define MSDC_PATCH_BIT_RD_DAT_SEL BIT(3) /* RW */
#define MSDC_INT_DAT_LATCH_CK_SEL GENMASK(9, 7)
#define MSDC_CKGEN_MSDC_DLY_SEL GENMASK(14, 10)
#define MSDC_PATCH_BIT_IODSSEL BIT(16) /* RW */
@@ -247,6 +254,8 @@
#define MSDC_PB2_SUPPORT_64G BIT(1) /* RW */
#define MSDC_PB2_RESPWAIT GENMASK(3, 2) /* RW */
#define MSDC_PB2_RESPSTSENSEL GENMASK(18, 16) /* RW */
+#define MSDC_PB2_POP_EN_CNT GENMASK(23, 20) /* RW */
+#define MSDC_PB2_CFGCRCSTSEDGE BIT(25) /* RW */
#define MSDC_PB2_CRCSTSENSEL GENMASK(31, 29) /* RW */
#define MSDC_PAD_TUNE_DATWRDLY GENMASK(4, 0) /* RW */
@@ -311,6 +320,12 @@
#define PAD_DS_DLY1 GENMASK(14, 10) /* RW */
#define PAD_DS_DLY3 GENMASK(4, 0) /* RW */
+/* LOOP_TEST_CONTROL mask */
+#define TEST_LOOP_DSCLK_MUX_SEL BIT(0) /* RW */
+#define TEST_LOOP_LATCH_MUX_SEL BIT(1) /* RW */
+#define LOOP_EN_SEL_CLK BIT(20) /* RW */
+#define TEST_HS400_CMD_LOOP_MUX_SEL BIT(31) /* RW */
+
#define REQ_CMD_EIO BIT(0)
#define REQ_CMD_TMO BIT(1)
#define REQ_DAT_ERR BIT(2)
@@ -391,6 +406,7 @@ struct msdc_save_para {
u32 emmc_top_control;
u32 emmc_top_cmd;
u32 emmc50_pad_ds_tune;
+ u32 loop_test_control;
};
struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
@@ -402,9 +418,13 @@ struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
bool data_tune;
bool busy_check;
bool stop_clk_fix;
+ u8 stop_dly_sel;
+ u8 pop_en_cnt;
bool enhance_rx;
bool support_64g;
bool use_internal_cd;
+ bool support_new_tx;
+ bool support_new_rx;
Is there really any platform that supports new_tx but *not* new_rx, or vice-versa?
If not, you can add just one `bool support_new_rx_tx` member to this structure.
};
struct msdc_tune_para {
@@ -621,6 +641,23 @@ static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8516_compat = {
.stop_clk_fix = true,
};
+static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8196_compat = {
+ .clk_div_bits = 12,
+ .recheck_sdio_irq = false,
+ .hs400_tune = false,
+ .pad_tune_reg = MSDC_PAD_TUNE0,
+ .async_fifo = true,
+ .data_tune = true,
+ .busy_check = true,
+ .stop_clk_fix = true,
+ .stop_dly_sel = 1,
+ .pop_en_cnt = 2,
+ .enhance_rx = true,
+ .support_64g = true,
+ .support_new_tx = true,
+ .support_new_rx = true,
+};
+
static const struct of_device_id msdc_of_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-mmc", .data = &mt2701_compat},
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-mmc", .data = &mt2712_compat},
@@ -632,6 +669,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id msdc_of_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-mmc", .data = &mt8135_compat},
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mmc", .data = &mt8173_compat},
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-mmc", .data = &mt8183_compat},
+ { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8196-mmc", .data = &mt8196_compat},
{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8516-mmc", .data = &mt8516_compat},
{}
@@ -872,6 +910,42 @@ static int msdc_ungate_clock(struct msdc_host *host)
(val & MSDC_CFG_CKSTB), 1, 20000);
}
+static void msdc_new_tx_setting(struct msdc_host *host)
+{
That's simpler:
if (!host->top_base)
return;
+ if (host->top_base) {
+ sdr_set_bits(host->top_base + LOOP_TEST_CONTROL,
+ TEST_LOOP_DSCLK_MUX_SEL);
+ sdr_set_bits(host->top_base + LOOP_TEST_CONTROL,
+ TEST_LOOP_LATCH_MUX_SEL);
+ sdr_clr_bits(host->top_base + LOOP_TEST_CONTROL,
+ TEST_HS400_CMD_LOOP_MUX_SEL);
+ }
+
+ switch (host->timing) {
+ case MMC_TIMING_LEGACY:
+ case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS:
+ case MMC_TIMING_SD_HS:
+ case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR12:
+ case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25:
+ case MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50:
+ case MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52:
+ if (host->top_base)
+ sdr_clr_bits(host->top_base + LOOP_TEST_CONTROL,
+ LOOP_EN_SEL_CLK);
+ break;
+ case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR50:
+ case MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104:
+ case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200:
+ case MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400:
+ if (host->top_base)
+ sdr_set_bits(host->top_base + LOOP_TEST_CONTROL,
+ LOOP_EN_SEL_CLK);
+ break;
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
{
struct mmc_host *mmc = mmc_from_priv(host);
@@ -881,6 +955,7 @@ static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
u32 sclk;
u32 tune_reg = host->dev_comp->pad_tune_reg;
u32 val;
+ bool timing_changed = false;
bool timing_changed;
if (!hz) {
dev_dbg(host->dev, "set mclk to 0\n");
@@ -890,6 +965,9 @@ static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
return;
}
+ if (host->timing != timing)
+ timing_changed = true;
else
timing_changed = false;
+
flags = readl(host->base + MSDC_INTEN);
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, flags);
if (host->dev_comp->clk_div_bits == 8)
@@ -996,6 +1074,9 @@ static void msdc_set_mclk(struct msdc_host *host, unsigned char timing, u32 hz)
sdr_set_field(host->base + tune_reg,
MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRRDLY,
host->hs400_cmd_int_delay);
+ if (timing_changed && host->dev_comp->support_new_tx)
I would invert this to (host->dev_comp->support_new_tx && timing_changed)
as that, at least to me, reads as "if this is new_tx - and the timing changed"
maning that the primary reason why we're checking is "if this is new_tx".
It's a personal preference though, so the final choice is yours.
+ msdc_new_tx_setting(host);
+
dev_dbg(host->dev, "sclk: %d, timing: %d\n", mmc->actual_clock,
timing);
}
@@ -1704,6 +1785,17 @@ static void msdc_init_hw(struct msdc_host *host)
reset_control_deassert(host->reset);
}
+ /* New tx/rx enable bit need to be 0->1 for hardware check */
+ if (host->dev_comp->support_new_tx) {
+ sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_ADV_CFG0, SDC_NEW_TX_EN);
+ sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_ADV_CFG0, SDC_NEW_TX_EN);
+ msdc_new_tx_setting(host);
+ }
+ if (host->dev_comp->support_new_rx) {
+ sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_NEW_RX_CFG, MSDC_NEW_RX_PATH_SEL);
+ sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_NEW_RX_CFG, MSDC_NEW_RX_PATH_SEL);
+ }
+
/* Configure to MMC/SD mode, clock free running */
sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_CFG, MSDC_CFG_MODE | MSDC_CFG_CKPDN);
@@ -1742,8 +1834,19 @@ static void msdc_init_hw(struct msdc_host *host)
sdr_set_bits(host->base + EMMC50_CFG0, EMMC50_CFG_CFCSTS_SEL);
if (host->dev_comp->stop_clk_fix) {
- sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1,
- MSDC_PATCH_BIT1_STOP_DLY, 3);
+ if (host->dev_comp->stop_dly_sel)
+ sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1,
+ MSDC_PATCH_BIT1_STOP_DLY,
+ host->dev_comp->stop_dly_sel & 0xf);
This doesn't look like being something to support new_tx and new_rx, but rather
a way to specify a different STOP_DLY depending on the SoC and its platdata.
So this one goes to a different commit, and you won't need either the 0xf masking
nor the `else`, as you will have to add the value to all SoCs' platdata instead.
+ else
+ sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1,
+ MSDC_PATCH_BIT1_STOP_DLY, 3);
+
+ if (host->dev_comp->pop_en_cnt)
+ sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT2,
+ MSDC_PB2_POP_EN_CNT,
+ host->dev_comp->pop_en_cnt & 0xf);
+
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_FIFO_CFG,
SDC_FIFO_CFG_WRVALIDSEL);
sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_FIFO_CFG,
@@ -2055,6 +2158,19 @@ static inline void msdc_set_data_delay(struct msdc_host *host, u32 value)
}
}
Regards,
Angelo
