On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:38:03AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote: > In preparation of supporting the mmc-slot subnode, allow > the nodename to be either mmc@ or mmc-slot@ > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml > index 58ae298cd2fc..f797c32ea688 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml > @@ -20,7 +20,9 @@ description: | > > properties: > $nodename: > - pattern: "^mmc(@.*)?$" > + oneOf: > + - pattern: "^mmc(@.*)?$" > + - pattern: "^slot(@.*)?$" I don't think mmc-slot is allowed by this. This should be squashed with mmc-slot child patch. It does not make sense to allow mmc-slots if there are no mmc-slots. Best regards, Krzysztof
