RE: [PATCH v8 1/4] rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) subsystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2024 3:13 PM
> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; op-
> tee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Shyam Saini <shyamsaini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ilias Apalodimas
> <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>;
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>; Manuel Traut
> <manut@xxxxxxxxx>; Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@xxxxxxxxxx>; Winkler,
> Tomas <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>; Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block
> (RPMB) subsystem
> 
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 1:36 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 01:26:18PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:29 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 03:31:24PM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/rpmb-core.c
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
> > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > >
> > > > Fine, but:
> > > >
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/rpmb.h
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
> > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause OR GPL-2.0 */
> > > >
> > > > Really?
> > > >
> > > > Why?  I need lots of documentation and a lawyer sign off for why
> > > > this is a dual license for a file that is obviously only for
> > > > internal Linux kernel stuff.
> > >
> > > I'm sorry that was added via one of the patch sets before mine. I'll
> > > revert to GPL-2.0 only.
> >
> > Please be sure to get proper legal approval to change the license of
> > code not written by you :)
> 
> The dual license was introduced in
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220405093759.1126835-2-
> alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx/,
> but https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/1478548394-8184-2-git-send-email-
> tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx/
> uses GPL-2.0 only. So reverting to GPL-2.0 only should be OK, don't you
> agree?


Ack. 






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux