RE: [PATCH v3] mmc: core: allow detection of locked cards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hello Avri,
> 
> On 2024-06-02 07:26, Avri Altman wrote:
> >> On 2024-05-23 15:20, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> > From: Daniel Kucera <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Locked card will not reply to SEND_SCR or SD_STATUS commands so it
> >> > was failing to initialize previously. When skipped, the card will
> >> > get initialized and CMD42 can be sent using ioctl to unlock the
> >> > card or remove password protection.
> >> > Until unlocked, all read/write calls will timeout.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kucera <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c index
> >> > 1c8148cdd..ae821df7d 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> >> > @@ -928,8 +928,19 @@ int mmc_sd_setup_card(struct mmc_host *host,
> >> > struct mmc_card *card,
> >> >       bool reinit)
> >> >  {
> >> >       int err;
> >> > +     u32 card_status;
> >> >
> >> > -     if (!reinit) {
> >> > +     err = mmc_send_status(card, &card_status);
> >> > +     if (err){
> >> > +             pr_err("%s: unable to get card status\n", mmc_hostname(host));
> >> > +             return err;
> >> > +     }
> >> > +
> >> > +     if (card_status & R1_CARD_IS_LOCKED){
> >> > +             pr_warn("%s: card is locked\n", mmc_hostname(host));
> >> > +     }
> >> > +
> >> > +     if (!reinit && !(card_status & R1_CARD_IS_LOCKED)) {
> >> >               /*
> >> >                * Fetch SCR from card.
> >> >                */
> >>
> >> Any feedback please?
> > You didn't address my comment from your v1 - Since eMMC & SD shares
> > the very same locking feature (non-COP SD that
> > is) -
> > You should at least explain in your commit log why it isn't an issue
> > for eMMC, If indeed it is not.
> 
> I'm sorry, I didn't get what you mean by that. I am touching only the sd.c code, not
> the mmc.c (where eMMC is initialized, am I correct?).
> How should I address this?
> Should I test with eMMC to SD adaptor? I don't have any currently.
Theoretically, looking in the eMMC spec, a locked eMMC device shouldn't have any issue returning from power down.
The only flow that is affected is that its not allowed to switch to hs200 in a locked state until unlocked - not to say that it is a problem.
If you can't verify that via code review,  can you test your mmc-utils code on an eMMC platform?

Thanks,
Avri
> 
> I am sorry if these are stupid questions, I am a layman.
> 
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Avri
> >
> >>
> >> D.
> 
> Thank you.
> Daniel.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux