On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 3:00 PM Jerome Forissier
<jerome.forissier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 5/27/24 14:13, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > Adds support in the OP-TEE drivers (both SMC and FF-A ABIs) to probe and
> > use an RPMB device via the RPMB subsystem instead of passing the RPMB
> > frames via tee-supplicant in user space. A fallback mechanism is kept to
> > route RPMB frames via tee-supplicant if the RPMB subsystem isn't
> > available.
> >
> > The OP-TEE RPC ABI is extended to support iterating over all RPMB
> > devices until one is found with the expected RPMB key already
> > programmed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Manuel Traut <manut@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-tee | 15 ++
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 96 +++++++++++-
> > drivers/tee/optee/device.c | 7 +
> > drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 14 ++
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_ffa.h | 2 +
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 26 +++-
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_rpc_cmd.h | 35 +++++
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h | 2 +
> > drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 14 ++
> > 11 files changed, 387 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-tee
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-tee b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-tee
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c9144d16003e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-tee
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > +What: /sys/class/tee/tee{,priv}X/rpmb_routing_model
>
> Wouldn't /sys/class/tee/teeX/rpmb_routing_model be good enough?
Doesn't the routing model concern tee-supplicant more than a TEE
client? Then it might make more sense to have
/sys/class/tee/teeprivX/rpmb_routing_model only. Keeping it for both
devices representing the same internal struct optee makes it easier to
find. Anyway, I don't mind removing one. Mikko, what do you prefer?
Cheers,
Jens
