Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add some DMI quirks to fix various issues on Bay Trail devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 19:26, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 4/25/24 6:21 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 21:16, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Here is v3 of my series adding DMI quirks to fix various issues on Intel
> >> Bay Trail tablets.
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Replace "mmc: sdhci-acpi: Disable UHS/1.8V modes on Lenovo Yoga
> >>   Tablet 2 series sdcard slot" with a new patch from Adrian which
> >>   actually fixes these modes:
> >>   "[PATCH v3 2/6] mmc: sdhci: Add support for "Tuning Error" interrupts"
> >>
> >>   Note this is missing a Signed-off-by from Adrian since this started out
> >>   as a quick test patch from Adrian.
> >>   Adrian, can you provide your S-o-b for this patch?
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Address a few small remarks from Andy and adds Andy's Reviewed-by
> >>   to the patches
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>
> >>
> >> Adrian Hunter (1):
> >>   mmc: sdhci: Add support for "Tuning Error" interrupts
> >>
> >> Hans de Goede (5):
> >>   mmc: core: Add mmc_gpiod_set_cd_config() function
> >>   mmc: sdhci-acpi: Sort DMI quirks alphabetically
> >>   mmc: sdhci-acpi: Fix Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro 1380 sdcard slot not
> >>     working
> >>   mmc: sdhci-acpi: Disable write protect detection on Toshiba WT10-A
> >>   mmc: sdhci-acpi: Add quirk to enable pull-up on the card-detect GPIO
> >>     on Asus T100TA
> >>
> >>  drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c  | 20 ++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c      | 10 ++++--
> >>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h      |  3 +-
> >>  include/linux/mmc/slot-gpio.h |  1 +
> >>  5 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > The series applied for next, thanks!
> >
> > I assume some/all these patches may deserve to get backported to
> > stable kernels, but it looks like that may be better for you to manage
> > by yourself!?
>
> From my pov the entire series is suitable for stable, so if you can mark
> them all for stable that would be great.

Alright, done!

Kind regards
Uffe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux