On Mar 18, 2024 at 14:52:02 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:55 AM Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Checkpatch warns that else is generally not necessary after a return
> > condition which exists in the if part of this function. Hence, just to
> > abide by what checkpatch recommends, follow it's guidelines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/pm_wakeup.h | 7 +++----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > index 428803eed798..76cd1f9f1365 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeup.h
> > @@ -234,11 +234,10 @@ static inline int device_init_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool enable)
> > if (enable) {
> > device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, true);
> > return device_wakeup_enable(dev);
> > - } else {
> > - device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> > - device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
> > - return 0;
> > }
> > + device_wakeup_disable(dev);
> > + device_set_wakeup_capable(dev, false);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > #endif /* _LINUX_PM_WAKEUP_H */
> > --
>
> This one is fine with me, but not 6.9-rc material.
OK, I completely understand.
--
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx>
