On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 20:49, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:57 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 15:38, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We should probably rename it part_cfg because that is what we > > > store in it, it's assigned from card->part[idx].part_cfg. > > > > > > Then the id field in mmc_rpmb_data should be deleted along > > > with all the IDA counter code etc and the partition name hardcoded > > > to be "0" as there will never be anything else. > > > > Seems reasonable to me. Are you thinking of sending a cleanup patch on > > top of $subject patch? >? > Yes I can do that once this patch is finalized and merged. Great! I don't think the $subject patch is perfect, but it's slim and suitable for stable - and of course it seems to do the job well. I am therefore queuing it for fixes, thanks everyone for helping out! Kind regards Uffe
