On 2/29/24 09:20, Xiongwei Song wrote:
The SLAB allocator has been removed sine 6.8-rc1 [1], so there is no user
with SLAB_MEM_SPREAD and cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread(). Then SLAB_MEM_SPREAD
is marked as unused by [2]. Here we can remove
cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread(). For more details, please check [3].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231120-slab-remove-slab-v2-0-9c9c70177183@xxxxxxx/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20240223-slab-cleanup-flags-v2-0-02f1753e8303@xxxxxxx/T/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/32bc1403-49da-445a-8c00-9686a3b0d6a3@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#mf14b838c5e0e77f4756d436bac3d8c0447ea4350
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index 875d12598bd2..0ce6ff0d9c9a 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -121,11 +121,6 @@ static inline int cpuset_do_page_mem_spread(void)
return task_spread_page(current);
}
-static inline int cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread(void)
-{
- return task_spread_slab(current);
-}
-
extern bool current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void);
extern void rebuild_sched_domains(void);
@@ -264,11 +259,6 @@ static inline int cpuset_do_page_mem_spread(void)
return 0;
}
-static inline int cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
static inline bool current_cpuset_is_being_rebound(void)
{
return false;
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
