Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: ac5: add mmc node and clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/12/2023 13:32, Elad Nachman wrote:
> From: Elad Nachman <enachman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add mmc and mmc clock nodes to ac5 and ac5x device tree files
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elad Nachman <enachman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/ac5-98dx25xx.dtsi | 33 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/ac5-98dx25xx.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/ac5-98dx25xx.dtsi
> index b5e042b8e929..decad14d0db8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/ac5-98dx25xx.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/ac5-98dx25xx.dtsi
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ soc {
>  		#address-cells = <2>;
>  		#size-cells = <2>;
>  		ranges;
> -		dma-ranges;
>  
>  		internal-regs@7f000000 {
>  			#address-cells = <1>;
> @@ -204,6 +203,31 @@ gpio1: gpio@18140 {
>  			};
>  		};
>  
> +		mmc_dma: mmc-dma-peripherals@80500000 {

Generic node name, so bus@?

> +				compatible = "simple-bus";
> +				#address-cells = <0x2>;
> +				#size-cells = <0x2>;
> +				ranges;

ranges is second.

You have address/size cells, so are you sure dtbs W=1 does not complain?


> +				dma-ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x2 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
> +				dma-coherent;
> +
> +				sdhci: mmc@805c0000 {
> +					compatible = "marvell,ac5-sdhci",
> +						     "marvell,armada-ap806-sdhci";
> +					reg = <0x0 0x805c0000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +					interrupts = <GIC_SPI 92 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +					clocks = <&emmc_clock>, <&cnm_clock>;
> +					clock-names = "core", "axi";
> +					status = "okay";

Drop

> +					bus-width = <8>;
> +					/*marvell,xenon-phy-slow-mode;*/

Drop or explain why commented code should be here.

> +					non-removable;
> +					mmc-ddr-1_8v;
> +					mmc-hs200-1_8v;
> +					mmc-hs400-1_8v;
> +				};
> +		};
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * Dedicated section for devices behind 32bit controllers so we
>  		 * can configure specific DMA mapping for them
> @@ -335,5 +359,12 @@ nand_clock: nand-clock {
>  			#clock-cells = <0>;
>  			clock-frequency = <400000000>;
>  		};
> +
> +		emmc_clock: emmc_clock {

No underscores in node names. I think you got such feedback before.

But anyway, this looks like a fake clock.

> +			compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +			#clock-cells = <0>;
> +			clock-frequency = <400000000>;
> +		};
> +

Drop

>  	};
>  };

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux