On 15/12/23 10:45, Avri Altman wrote:
>> +static int mmc_test_retuning(struct mmc_test_card *test) {
>> + if (!mmc_can_retune(test->card->host)) {
>> + pr_info("%s: No retuning - test skipped\n",
>> + mmc_hostname(test->card->host));
>> + return RESULT_UNSUP_HOST;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return mmc_test_rnd_perf(test, 0, 0, 8192, 30, 1);
>> }
> I wonder if it would make sense to make a RPMB flavor for the re-tuning test?
Perhaps, but maybe that could be done from user space / mmc-utils.
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -2921,6 +2934,14 @@ static const struct mmc_test_case
>> mmc_test_cases[] = {
>> .run = mmc_test_cmds_during_write_cmd23_nonblock,
>> .cleanup = mmc_test_area_cleanup,
>> },
>> +
>> + {
>> + .name = "Re-tuning reliability",
>> + .prepare = mmc_test_area_prepare,
>> + .run = mmc_test_retuning,
>> + .cleanup = mmc_test_area_cleanup,
>> + },
>> +
>> };
>>
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(mmc_test_lock);
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>
