Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] introduce priority-based shutdown support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 11/27/23 15:08, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> > Yes, using device tree would be good, but now you have created something
> > that is device-tree-specific and not all the world is device tree :(

> True. However, my understanding is that the regulator subsystem is largely
> written to work with DT-based systems. Hence supporting the DT-based
> solution would probably fit to this specific use-case as source of problem
> notifications is the regulator subsystem.

Yes, ACPI has a strong model that things like regulators and clocks are
not visible to the OS.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Memonry Technology]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux