On 26/10/23 10:00, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 26/10/23 09:14, Nitin Yadav wrote:
>> ti,otap-del-sel-legacy/ti,itap-del-sel-legacy passed from DT
>> are currently ignored for all SD/MMC and eMMC modes. Fix this
>> by making start loop index to MMC_TIMING_LEGACY.
>>
>> Fixes: 8ee5fc0e0b3be ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Update OTAPDLY writes")
>>
>
> There isn't usually a blank line here
>
> Perhaps a Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx tag?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Yadav <n-yadav@xxxxxx>
>
> Nevertheless:
>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Sorry, sent that prematurely - see comment below
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> index 544aaaf5cb0f..aae9d255c6a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ static int sdhci_am654_get_otap_delay(struct sdhci_host *host,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
Isn't the MMC_TIMING_LEGACY information read at the top of
sdhci_am654_get_otap_delay()?
>> - for (i = MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS; i <= MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400; i++) {
>> + for (i = MMC_TIMING_LEGACY; i <= MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400; i++) {
>>
>> ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, td[i].otap_binding,
>> &sdhci_am654->otap_del_sel[i]);
>
