On Fri, 29 Sept 2023 at 21:17, Vincent Whitchurch
<vincent.whitchurch@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> During board verification, there is a need to test the various supported
> eMMC/SD speed modes. However, since the framework chooses the best mode
> supported by the card and the host controller's caps, this currently
> necessitates changing the devicetree for every iteration.
>
> Allow the various speed mode host capabilities to be modified via
> debugfs in order to allow easier hardware verification. The values to
> be written are the raw MMC_CAP* values from include/linux/mmc/host.h.
> This is rather low-level, and these defines are not guaranteed to be
> stable, but it is perhaps good enough for the intended use case.
>
> MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM can also be set, in order to be able to
> re-initialize the card without having to physically remove and re-insert
> it.
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0# grep timing ios
> timing spec: 9 (mmc HS200)
>
> // Turn on MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM and re-trigger runtime suspend
> /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0# echo $(($(cat caps) | (1 << 7))) > caps
> /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0# echo on > /sys/bus/mmc/devices/mmc0\:0001/power/control
> /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0# echo auto > /sys/bus/mmc/devices/mmc0\:0001/power/control
>
> // MMC_CAP2_HS200_1_8V_SDR
> /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0# echo $(($(cat caps2) & ~(1 << 5))) > caps2
$(($(cat caps2) & ~(1 << 5))) looks complicated, does it use echo DDR52 > caps2?
> /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0# echo on > /sys/bus/mmc/devices/mmc0\:0001/power/control
> /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0# grep timing ios
> timing spec: 8 (mmc DDR52)
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c b/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c
> index 2c97b94aab23..1642ea72d22c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/debugfs.c
> @@ -12,9 +12,12 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/stat.h>
> #include <linux/fault-inject.h>
> +#include <linux/time.h>
>
> #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
> +#include <linux/mmc/mmc.h>
> +#include <linux/mmc/sd.h>
>
> #include "core.h"
> #include "card.h"
> @@ -298,6 +301,49 @@ static const struct file_operations mmc_err_stats_fops = {
> .release = single_release,
> };
>
> +static int mmc_caps_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> +{
> + *val = *(u32 *)data;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mmc_caps_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> + u32 *caps = data;
> + u32 diff = *caps ^ val;
> + u32 allowed = MMC_CAP_AGGRESSIVE_PM |
> + MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
> + MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED |
> + MMC_CAP_UHS |
> + MMC_CAP_DDR;
> +
> + if (diff & ~allowed)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *caps = val;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int mmc_caps2_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> + u32 allowed = MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V | MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_2V;
> + u32 *caps = data;
> + u32 diff = *caps ^ val;
> +
> + if (diff & ~allowed)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *caps = val;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(mmc_caps_fops, mmc_caps_get, mmc_caps_set,
> + "0x%08llx\n");
> +DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(mmc_caps2_fops, mmc_caps_get, mmc_caps2_set,
> + "0x%08llx\n");
> +
> void mmc_add_host_debugfs(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> struct dentry *root;
> @@ -306,8 +352,9 @@ void mmc_add_host_debugfs(struct mmc_host *host)
> host->debugfs_root = root;
>
> debugfs_create_file("ios", S_IRUSR, root, host, &mmc_ios_fops);
> - debugfs_create_x32("caps", S_IRUSR, root, &host->caps);
> - debugfs_create_x32("caps2", S_IRUSR, root, &host->caps2);
> + debugfs_create_file("caps", 0600, root, &host->caps, &mmc_caps_fops);
> + debugfs_create_file("caps2", 0600, root, &host->caps2,
> + &mmc_caps2_fops);
Would it be better to use "S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR" instead of "0600"?
> debugfs_create_file_unsafe("clock", S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR, root, host,
> &mmc_clock_fops);
>
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
