Hi Claudiu,
Thanks for your patch!
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:53 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On RZ/G3S PFC register allow setting 8 functions for individual ports
> (function1 to function8). For function1 register need to be configured
> with 0, for function8 register need to be configured with 7.
> We cannot use zero based addressing when requesting functions from
> different code places as documentation (RZG3S_pinfunction_List_r1.0.xlsx)
> states explicitly that function0 has different meaning.
According to that table, function0 is GPIO.
> For this add a new member to struct rzg2l_hwcfg that will keep the
> offset that need to be substracted before applying a value to PFC register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
But one question below...
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> @@ -136,9 +136,11 @@ struct rzg2l_register_offsets {
> /**
> * struct rzg2l_hwcfg - hardware configuration data structure
> * @regs: hardware specific register offsets
> + * @func_base: base number for port function (see register PFC)
> */
> struct rzg2l_hwcfg {
> const struct rzg2l_register_offsets regs;
> + u8 func_base;
> };
>
> struct rzg2l_dedicated_configs {
> @@ -221,6 +223,7 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> unsigned int group_selector)
> {
> struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> + const struct rzg2l_hwcfg *hwcfg = pctrl->data->hwcfg;
> const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pin_desc;
> unsigned int i, *psel_val, *pin_data;
> struct function_desc *func;
> @@ -247,9 +250,9 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_set_mux(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
> off = RZG2L_PIN_CFG_TO_PORT_OFFSET(*pin_data);
>
> dev_dbg(pctrl->dev, "port:%u pin: %u off:%x PSEL:%u\n", port,
> - pin, off, psel_val[i]);
> + pin, off, psel_val[i] - hwcfg->func_base);
>
> - rzg2l_pinctrl_set_pfc_mode(pctrl, pin, off, psel_val[i]);
> + rzg2l_pinctrl_set_pfc_mode(pctrl, pin, off, psel_val[i] - hwcfg->func_base);
> }
>
> return 0;
Perhaps the adjustment should be done in rzg2l_dt_subnode_to_map()
instead, when obtaining MUX_FUNC() from DT? That would allow you to do
some basic validation on it too, which is currently completely missing
(reject out-of-range values overflowing into adjacent PFC fields,
reject zero on RZ/G3S).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
