On 14.09.2023 16:04, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Claudiu,
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:52 AM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> core->name already contains the clock name thus, there is no
>> need to check the GET_SHIFT(core->conf) to decide on it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
>> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/rzg2l-cpg.c
>> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ rzg2l_cpg_sd_mux_clk_register(const struct cpg_core_clk *core,
>> clk_hw_data->priv = priv;
>> clk_hw_data->conf = core->conf;
>>
>> - init.name = GET_SHIFT(core->conf) ? "sd1" : "sd0";
>> + init.name = core->name;
>
> Note that this does change the case of the names (e.g. "SD0" => "sd0").
> I guess no one cares...
As of my experiments and investigation we should be good with it.
>
>> init.ops = &rzg2l_cpg_sd_clk_mux_ops;
>> init.flags = 0;
>> init.num_parents = core->num_parents;
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
