Hi Andy,
linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:12:40 +0200:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:05 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 2:50 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Use the new, less cumbersome interface for setting the GPIO as
> > > active-high that doesn't require first checking the current state.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > * here for older DTs so we can re-use the generic nand_gpio_waitrdy()
> > > * helper, and be consistent with what other drivers do.
> > > */
> > > - if (of_machine_is_compatible("qi,lb60") &&
> > > - gpiod_is_active_low(nand->busy_gpio))
> > > - gpiod_toggle_active_low(nand->busy_gpio);
> > > + if (of_machine_is_compatible("qi,lb60"))
> > > + gpiod_set_active_high(nand->busy_gpio);
> >
> > Why not moving this quirk to gpiolib-of.c?
>
> That's a better idea here I think, it's clearly a quirk for a
> buggy device tree.
Agreed, it's just for backward compatibility purposes in a single
driver. I believe it should stay here.
Thanks,
Miquèl
