Hi Daniel, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 19 Jul 2023 23:03:24 +0100: > As the MTD subsystem already acts as an NVMEM provider, emulated mtdblock > devices should not be considered NVMEM providers. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c > index ff18636e08897..82d5afba6a25a 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c > @@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ int add_mtd_blktrans_dev(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *new) > gd->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART; > } > > + gd->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_NVMEM; > set_capacity(gd, ((u64)new->size * tr->blksize) >> 9); > > /* Create the request queue */ Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Miquèl
