On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 04:07:25PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
> and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
> quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
> quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
> void.
>
> Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> callback to the void returning variant.
>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> index 8098726dcc0b..5465a7225df4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> @@ -1523,14 +1523,14 @@ static int rtsx_pci_sdmmc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int rtsx_pci_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static void rtsx_pci_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct rtsx_pcr *pcr;
> struct mmc_host *mmc;
>
> if (!host)
> - return 0;
> + return;
If host is NULL, there is a problem. While sometimes (rarely) driver
maintainers object, I usually remove these, see for example
3d82dca0f27ac5a0bfbbce439bba5c6452f3b7da.
> pcr = host->pcr;
> pcr->slots[RTSX_SD_CARD].p_dev = NULL;
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
