On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 at 19:20, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dennis, > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 1:48 AM Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > When using dm-verity with a data partition on an emmc device, dm-verity > > races with the discovery of attached emmc devices. This is because mmc's > > probing code sets up the host data structure then a work item is > > scheduled to do discovery afterwards. To prevent this race on init, > > let's inline the first call to detection, __mm_scan(), and let > > subsequent detect calls be handled via the workqueue. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 2cc83bf7d41113d9 ("mmc: > core: Allow mmc_start_host() synchronously detect a card") in > linux-next/master mmc/next next-20230614 next-20230615 next-20230616 > > I have bisected the following failure on Renesas Salvator-XS with R-Car H3 > ES2.0 to the above commit: > > renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee140000.mmc: timeout waiting for > hardware interrupt (CMD0) > renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee140000.mmc: timeout waiting for > hardware interrupt (CMD1) > renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee140000.mmc: timeout waiting for > hardware interrupt (CMD0) > renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee140000.mmc: timeout waiting for > hardware interrupt (CMD1) > mmc0: Failed to initialize a non-removable card Thanks for reporting! After I had a closer look, I realize that all the renesas/tmio drivers are suffering from the similar problem. A host driver must not call mmc_add_host() before it's ready to serve requests. Things like initializing an irq-handler must be done before mmc_add_host() is called, which is not the case for renesas/tmio. In fact, there seems to be a few other host drivers that have the similar pattern in their probe routines. Note that, even if the offending commit below triggers this problem 100% of the cases (as the probe path has now becomes synchronous), there was a potential risk even before. Previously, mmc_add_host() ended up punting a work - and if that work ended up sending a request to the host driver, *before* the irq-handler would be ready, we would hit the similar problem. I bet adding an msleep(1000) immediately after mmc_add_host() in tmio_mmc_host_probe(), would then trigger this problem too. :-) That said, I am going to revert the offending commit to fix these problems, for now. Then I will try to help out and fixup the relevant host drivers - and when that is done, we can give this whole thing a new try. Any objections or other suggestions to this? Kind regards Uffe > > Reverting the commit fixes the issue for me. > > > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c > > @@ -2185,10 +2185,8 @@ int mmc_card_alternative_gpt_sector(struct mmc_card *card, sector_t *gpt_sector) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_card_alternative_gpt_sector); > > > > -void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work) > > +static void __mmc_rescan(struct mmc_host *host) > > { > > - struct mmc_host *host = > > - container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work); > > int i; > > > > if (host->rescan_disable) > > @@ -2249,6 +2247,14 @@ void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work) > > mmc_schedule_delayed_work(&host->detect, HZ); > > } > > > > +void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work) > > +{ > > + struct mmc_host *host = > > + container_of(work, struct mmc_host, detect.work); > > + > > + __mmc_rescan(host); > > +} > > + > > void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host) > > { > > host->f_init = max(min(freqs[0], host->f_max), host->f_min); > > @@ -2261,7 +2267,8 @@ void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host) > > } > > > > mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(host); > > - _mmc_detect_change(host, 0, false); > > + host->detect_change = 1; > > + __mmc_rescan(host); > > } > > > > void __mmc_stop_host(struct mmc_host *host) > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds