Hi > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2023 um 15:37 Uhr > Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > On 27/06/2023 14:09, Frank Wunderlich wrote: > >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Juni 2023 um 12:44 Uhr > >> Von: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: mtk-sd: update assigned-clocks/clock-parents for mt7986 > >> > >> On 25/06/2023 21:11, Frank Wunderlich wrote: > >>> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> MT7986 has 2 clock-parents so update the binding for it. > >> > >> You didn't test it, I think. If you do, then you will see errors from > >> other trees. > > > > Hi, > > > > i tested it of course...which errors do you see? > > The top-level said it can be maximum 1, so raising it in allOf:if:then: > should not be enough but the previous error with too long list wasn't there after the change...so it seems to work...if it right, i don't know, but other properties are overriddedn the same way. > > 11 > > this is basicly how i tested it (in case anything has changed): > > > > logfile=dtbs_arm64.log > > exec 3> >(tee $logfile) > > ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check 2>&3 > > if [[ $? -ne 0 ]];then echo "arm64 binding check failed!";cat $logfile;exit 1;fi > > ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make defconfig #dtbs_check need kernel-config > > ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make -j8 DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dtbs_check 2>&3 > > if [[ $? -ne 0 ]];then echo "arm64 dtbs_check failed!";cat $logfile;exit 1;fi > > A bit over-complicated... why not running dtbs_check against the schema > you changed? it is a script i only start ;) and having a logfile (with all messages - stdin+stdout) makes it easier to find something. i had always the problem, that second run does not show the errors again without changing the yaml or dts. as you see below i tried the run against the yaml too, but there are many many unrelated compatibles which seem to be not documented or still in txt bindings. > > and looked into the resulting logfile for keywords like mmc like mtk-sd > > > > i tried running dtbs_check with passing the yaml-file, but of course all compatibles not matching this file were reported. > > > > ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make -j6 DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.yaml > > > > but this spits out many errors "failed to match any schema with compatible" because i defined only the changed one... > > > > maybe there is another way to check only one yaml file against all dtbs without these unrelated errors. > > > > pipeline in dt-bindings-patchwork is clean too > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20230625191151.7808-2-linux@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Maybe that binding just fails to apply to DTS because of missing or not > correct compatibles. the messages are unrelated to current yaml file i passed with the DT_SCHEMA_FILES parameter, e.g. the last messages: From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dsi.yaml arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@15020000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-imgsys', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@16000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-vdecsys', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@17000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-vencsys', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@19000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_conn', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@19010000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_adl', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@19180000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_core0', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@19280000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-ipu_core1', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /soc/syscon@1a000000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183-camsys', 'syscon'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb:0:0: /mt8183-sound: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['mediatek,mt8183_mt6358_ts3a227_max98357'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183-kukui-jacuzzi-burnet.dtb: bt-sco: '#sound-dai-cells' is a required property > >> Anyway, I don't understand why defining it in the first place. Just drop > >> the assigned-clock* from the binding. > > > > as it was defined (not looked where it was used) i only used the soc-specific branch to update the MaxItems...just to not break anything. After that the message i got before was fixed > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7986a-bananapi-bpi-r3.dtb: mmc@11230000: assigned-clocks: [[4, 35], [4, 34]] is too long > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt7986a-bananapi-bpi-r3.dtb: mmc@11230000: assigned-clock-parents: [[5, 6], [4, 18]] is too long > > > > but if the right way is to drop the MaxItems from generic (or the property itself - where is it taken from then?). The only > > include i see is Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml and there the assigned-clock* is not defined. And the > > The way is to entirely drop assigned-clocks. I don't think there are > much benefits of having them in the bindings. Maybe if specific rates > are required, then yes - device cannot work with other rates and you can > verify it with dtbs_check. But otherwise it is like adding values of > 'reg' or 'interrupts'. Plus some board might require third item and then > what? mhm, disabled all assigned-clock* properties and do not get any messages about this (don't know why because of "unevaluatedProperties: false", but looks like it works) there are only some syscon-nodes in mt8173-*.dtb where these properties used are reported btw. need binding also be backported to stable? so do i need to add the tag there? regards Frank
