On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:27 AM Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > STM32 variants also have busy_detect = true. > Could that be an issue to initialize this work, which seem dedicated to > ux500? As Ulf says it is just initialized then it is left unused. I renamed the software timeout ux500_busy_timeout_work() from the previous name busy_timeout_work() but I actually thought it could make sense to enable it on STM32 as well. It is essentially a last resort fallback if the card does not properly report busy end or the block fails to detect it for some reason. Yours, Linus Walleij
