The busy detect callback for Ux500 checks for an error
in the status in the first if() clause. The only practical
reason is that if an error occurs, the if()-clause is not
executed, and the code falls through to the last
if()-clause if (host->busy_status) which will clear and
disable the irq. Make this explicit instead: it is easier
to read.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
ChangeLog v3->v4:
- No changes.
ChangeLog v2->v3:
- Rebased.
ChangeLog v1->v2:
- No changes
---
drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
index 47b306e45f78..d632658d9d20 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c
@@ -665,6 +665,15 @@ static bool ux500_busy_complete(struct mmci_host *host, u32 status, u32 err_msk)
{
void __iomem *base = host->base;
+ if (status & err_msk) {
+ /* Stop any ongoing busy detection if an error occurs */
+ writel(host->variant->busy_detect_mask, base + MMCICLEAR);
+ writel(readl(base + MMCIMASK0) &
+ ~host->variant->busy_detect_mask, base + MMCIMASK0);
+ host->busy_status = 0;
+ return true;
+ }
+
/*
* Before unmasking for the busy end IRQ, confirm that the
* command was sent successfully. To keep track of having a
@@ -678,7 +687,7 @@ static bool ux500_busy_complete(struct mmci_host *host, u32 status, u32 err_msk)
* while, to allow it to be set, but tests indicates that it
* isn't needed.
*/
- if (!host->busy_status && !(status & err_msk)) {
+ if (!host->busy_status) {
status = readl(base + MMCISTATUS);
if (status & host->variant->busy_detect_flag) {
writel(readl(base + MMCIMASK0) |
--
2.40.1
