Il 29/03/23 10:54, Alexandre Mergnat ha scritto:
In order to use the PMIC, the pwrap support should be added
to allow communication between the SoC and the PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
index e018df6844f6..687011353f69 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
@@ -186,6 +186,18 @@ apmixedsys: syscon@1000c000 {
#clock-cells = <1>;
};
+ pwrap: pwrap@1000d000 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt8365-pwrap";
+ reg = <0 0x1000d000 0 0x1000>;
+ reg-names = "pwrap";
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 123 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ clocks = <&infracfg CLK_IFR_PWRAP_SPI>,
+ <&infracfg CLK_IFR_PMIC_AP>,
+ <&infracfg CLK_IFR_PWRAP_SYS>,
+ <&infracfg CLK_IFR_PWRAP_TMR>;
I would prefer:
clocks = <&infracfg CLK_IFR_PWRAP_SPI>, <&infracfg CLK_IFR_PMIC_AP>,
<&infracfg CLK_IFR_PWRAP_SYS>, <&infracfg CLK_IFR_PWRAP_TMR>;
....but I'll leave this choice to you, as I don't have really strong opinions on
this one, so, with or without the proposed change, you still get my:
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
