On 12/03/2023 11:49, Sergey Lisov wrote: >> >> Anyway, I said last time this looks compatible-specific, so I don't >> think we need another property. >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof > > I agree, but I'm afraid of introducing regressions by enabling this > workaround on systems that don't actually need it. I don't understand why would you enable it for systems which do not need it? Best regards, Krzysztof
