On 24/11/22 08:46, andy.tang@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@xxxxxxx>
>
> The highest clock frequency for eMMC HS200 mode on ls1043a
> is 116.7Mhz according to its specification.
> So add the limit to gate the frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Tang <andy.tang@xxxxxxx>
It is probably nicer to use a consistent email name. checkpatch gives this warning:
WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@xxxxxxx>' != 'Signed-off-by: Andy Tang <andy.tang@xxxxxxx>'
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> index 00542dd74c07..1fd4ae10862d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ static const struct esdhc_clk_fixup ls1021a_esdhc_clk = {
> .max_clk[MMC_TIMING_SD_HS] = 46500000,
> };
>
> +static const struct esdhc_clk_fixup ls1043a_esdhc_clk = {
> + .sd_dflt_max_clk = 25000000,
> + .max_clk[MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104] = 116700000,
> + .max_clk[MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200] = 116700000,
> +};
ls1043a_esdhc_clk seems the same as ls1046a_esdhc_clk
Should they be shared? e.g. called ls104xx_esdhc_clk
> +
> static const struct esdhc_clk_fixup ls1046a_esdhc_clk = {
> .sd_dflt_max_clk = 25000000,
> .max_clk[MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104] = 167000000,
> @@ -64,6 +70,7 @@ static const struct esdhc_clk_fixup p1010_esdhc_clk = {
>
> static const struct of_device_id sdhci_esdhc_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-esdhc", .data = &ls1021a_esdhc_clk},
> + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-esdhc", .data = &ls1043a_esdhc_clk},
> { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc", .data = &ls1046a_esdhc_clk},
> { .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-esdhc", .data = &ls1012a_esdhc_clk},
> { .compatible = "fsl,p1010-esdhc", .data = &p1010_esdhc_clk},
