On 11/06/22 00:12, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > sdhci_pltfm_unregister() returns 0 unconditionally and returning an > error in a platform remove callback isn't very sensible. (The only > effect of the latter is that the device core emits a generic warning and > then removes the device anyhow.) > > So return 0 unconditionally to make it obvious there is no error > forwarded to the upper layers. > > This is a preparation for making platform remove callbacks return void. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-st.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-st.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-st.c > index d41582c21aa3..6415916fbd91 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-st.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-st.c > @@ -440,15 +440,14 @@ static int sdhci_st_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); > struct st_mmc_platform_data *pdata = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); > struct reset_control *rstc = pdata->rstc; > - int ret; > > - ret = sdhci_pltfm_unregister(pdev); > + sdhci_pltfm_unregister(pdev); > > clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->icnclk); > > reset_control_assert(rstc); > > - return ret; > + return 0; > } > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
