On Sun, 27 Mar 2022 at 14:39, Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The SDHC controller in the imx8mn and imx8mp have the same controller > as the imx8mm which is slightly different than that of the imx7d. > Using the fallback of the imx8mm enables the controllers to support > HS400-ES which is not available on the imx7d. After discussion with NXP, > it turns out that the imx8qm should fall back to the imx8qxp, because > those have some additional flags not present in the imx8mm. > > Suggested-by: haibo.chen@xxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> I didn't quite follow all the discussions on patch3 - and whether that may affect the binding. Anyway, I assume you will send a new version. If not, please tell and will pick this up. Kind regards Uffe > --- > V2: Added suggested-by note and imx8qxp updates. > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 16 +++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > index 7dbbcae9485c..1427e9b5a6ec 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml > @@ -34,23 +34,25 @@ properties: > - fsl,imx6ull-usdhc > - fsl,imx7d-usdhc > - fsl,imx7ulp-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc > - fsl,imxrt1050-usdhc > - nxp,s32g2-usdhc > - items: > - enum: > - - fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > - - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc > - - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc > - fsl,imx8mq-usdhc > - - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc > - - fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc > - const: fsl,imx7d-usdhc > - items: > - enum: > - - fsl,imx93-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8mn-usdhc > + - fsl,imx8mp-usdhc > - fsl,imx8ulp-usdhc > + - fsl,imx93-usdhc > - const: fsl,imx8mm-usdhc > - > + - items: > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx8qm-usdhc > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-usdhc > reg: > maxItems: 1 > > -- > 2.34.1 >
