Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 18:14, Jerome Pouiller > <Jerome.Pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Note that the values used by Silabs are uncommon. A driver cannot fully >> rely on the SDIO PnP. It should also check if the device is declared in >> the DT. >> >> So, to apply the quirks necessary for the Silabs WF200, we rely on the >> DT rather than on the SDIO VID/PID. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I guess the series is getting close to getting queued up? > > As an option to make sure $subject patch doesn't cause a problem for > that, I can queue it up and send it for the 5.17-rcs or if Kalle > prefer to carry this in this tree with my ack? > > Kalle? The easiest is if you can take it to your tree, tack! -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
