Because of the possible failure of the dma_supported(), the
dma_set_mask_and_coherent() may return error num.
Therefore, it should be better to check it and return the error if
fails.
Also, the caller, esdhc_of_resume(), should deal with the return value.
Moreover, as the sdhci_esdhc_driver has not been used, it does not need to
be considered.
Fixes: 5552d7ad596c ("mmc: sdhci-of-esdhc: set proper dma mask for ls104x chips")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
index a593b1fbd69e..bedfc7bb5174 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
@@ -524,12 +524,16 @@ static void esdhc_of_adma_workaround(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
static int esdhc_of_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
{
+ int ret;
u32 value;
struct device *dev = mmc_dev(host->mmc);
if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1043a-esdhc") ||
- of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc"))
- dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
+ of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "fsl,ls1046a-esdhc")) {
+ ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(40));
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
value = sdhci_readl(host, ESDHC_DMA_SYSCTL);
@@ -1245,7 +1249,10 @@ static int esdhc_of_resume(struct device *dev)
if (ret == 0) {
/* Isn't this already done by sdhci_resume_host() ? --rmk */
- esdhc_of_enable_dma(host);
+ ret = esdhc_of_enable_dma(host);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
sdhci_writel(host, esdhc_proctl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL);
}
return ret;
--
2.25.1
