On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 17:59, Marten Lindahl <martenli@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 03:54:19PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 12:05, Mårten Lindahl <marten.lindahl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The TMOUT register is always set with a full value for every transfer, > > > which (with a 200MHz clock) will give a full DRTO of ~84 milliseconds. > > > Since the software dto_timer acts as a backup in cases when this timeout > > > is not long enough, it is normally not a problem. But setting a full > > > value makes it impossible to test shorter timeouts, when for example > > > testing data read times on different SD cards. > > > > > > Add a function to set any value smaller than the maximum of 0xFFFFFF. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mårten Lindahl <marten.lindahl@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Applied for next, thanks! > > > > Kind regards > > Uffe > > > > Hi Ulf! > > During tests on some units I found that there is a potential overflow > of the 32bit divider in this patch (if clk_div > 4). > > Is it possible to stop this patch, until I created a new version of it? > I guess it's better to update this patch, in favour of sending a new > correction patch for it? I have dropped the patch from my next branch. Please send a v4. [...] Kind regards Uffe
