Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] clk/mmc: renesas_sdhi: refactor SDnH to be a separate clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] clk/mmc: renesas_sdhi: refactor SDnH to be a separate clock
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 16:23:38 +0100
Cc: "linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <OS0PR01MB5922A97F46F04F3EBDD8E55886989@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

> I have tested this patch series on RZ/G2{M,N,E,L} boards
> and all looks good.

Awesome! Thank you very much for this testing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] clk/mmc: renesas_sdhi: refactor SDnH to be a separate clock
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- RE: [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] clk/mmc: renesas_sdhi: refactor SDnH to be a separate clock
  - From: Biju Das

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ASoC: dai_dma: remove slave_id field
Next by Date: [PATCH] mmc: cavium: Ensure proper mapping between request and interrupt
Previous by thread: RE: [RFC PATCH v2 00/21] clk/mmc: renesas_sdhi: refactor SDnH to be a separate clock
Next by thread: [PATCH V4 0/9] dt-bindinds/dts: support i.MX8ULP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Memonry Technology] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux