Hi Chin-Ting,
Sorry for the delay in looking at your series.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021, at 20:01, Chin-Ting Kuo wrote:
> From the analog waveform analysis result, SD/SDIO controller
> of AST2600 cannot always work well with 200MHz. The upper bound
> stable frequency for SD/SDIO controller is 100MHz. Thus, SDR50
> supported bit, instead of SDR104, in capability 2 register
> should be set in advance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chin-Ting Kuo <chin-ting_kuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> index 6e4e132903a6..c6eaeb02e3f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
> #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V (0 * 32 + 26)
> /* SDIO{14,24} */
> #define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104 (1 * 32 + 1)
> +/* SDIO{14,24} */
I don't think we need to duplicate this comment.
> +#define ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 (1 * 32 + 0)
Can we keep the defines in increasing bit order (i.e. put
ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50 above ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104)?
>
> struct aspeed_sdc {
> struct clk *clk;
> @@ -410,11 +412,17 @@ static int aspeed_sdhci_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> sdhci_get_of_property(pdev);
>
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "mmc-hs200-1_8v") ||
> + of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50") ||
Minor formatting issue, but can you make sure all the conditions are
aligned vertically from the left?
> of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP1_1_8V,
> true, slot);
> }
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr50")) {
> + aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR50,
> + true, slot);
> + }
> +
> if (of_property_read_bool(np, "sd-uhs-sdr104")) {
> aspeed_sdc_set_slot_capability(host, dev->parent, ASPEED_SDC_CAP2_SDR104,
> true, slot);
> --
> 2.17.1
