On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 05:32:45PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> On 08/18/21 08:43, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:18:25PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When launching the hostapd application on a i.MX7 based board with an
> > > ath10k device connected via SDIO, the following "NOHZ tick-stop error"
> > > messages are seen:
> > >
> > > # hostapd /etc/wifi.conf
> > > Configuration file: /etc/wifi.conf
> > > wlan0: interface state UNINITIALIZED->COUNTRY_UPDATE
> > > [ 63.021149] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > Using interface wlan0 with hwaddr 00:1f:7b:31:04:a0 and ssid "thessid"
> > > [ 67.332470] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready
> > > wlan0: interface state COUNTRY_UPDATE->ENABLED
> > > wlan0: AP-ENABLED
> > > [ 68.025845] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 69.025973] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 69.607432] cfg80211: failed to load regulatory.db
> > > [ 72.026748] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 73.027039] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 74.027159] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 75.027109] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 76.027461] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 77.027391] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > > [ 78.027560] NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is
> > > pending, handler #08!!!
> > >
> > > This happens on all kernel versions from 5.10 to 5.13.
> > >
> > > Any ideas on how to fix this problem?
> >
> > I believe that you need this commit (and possibly some prerequsites):
> >
> > 47c218dcae65 ("tick/sched: Prevent false positive softirq pending warnings on RT")
> >
> > Adding Qais on CC for his thoughts.
>
> Sorry for the late response. A combination of holidays and sickness kept me
> away from email for a while.
>
> I did see an issue on 5.10 recently but I was running android kernel. I thought
> initially the problem is similar to the upstream one we were seeing on mainline
> for a while in the past but it turned out a genuine bug due to a patch that
> tries to 'fix' softirq interference with RT. Reverting that patch fixed the
> issue for me. It turned out later that it was specific to the platform I was
> running on and it's not reproducible by others on other platforms.
>
> Upstream 5.10-LTS was fine for me.
>
> HTH.
Good to hear that you found the problem and fixed it!
Thanx, Paul
