On 06/09/2021 10:38, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 30/08/2021 16:09, Rob Herring wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >> >> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:02 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski >> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 24/08/2021 16:33, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 05:44:32PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>>> The Microchip MPFS Icicle Kit uses Cadence SD/SDIO/eMMC Host Controller >>>>> without any additional vendor compatible: >>>> I think the lack of vendor compatible is the error here. Experience has >>>> shown that vendor specific compatibles are needed for licensed IP. >>>> >>> In such case this could be: >>> 1. a specific "microchip,mpfs250t-sd4hc", which >>> seems to be on MPFS Icicle Kit: >>> https://www.digikey.co.uk/en/product-highlight/m/microchip-technology/mpfs-icicle-kit-es--polarfire-soc-fpga-icicle-kit >>> >>> 2. or a generic "microchip,mpfs-sd4hc" >>> >>> Any hints here? >> Best for a Microchip person to answer, but sure there's some existing >> compatible strings for other blocks on this chip to follow the same >> pattern. >> >> Rob > > #2 would be ideal since the controller doesn't change across the part > range, the 250t bit in the part name just covers the size/configuration > of the FPGA. Thanks! I'll go with the microchip,mpfs-sd4hc. Best regards, Krzysztof
