18.08.2021 17:07, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:27:27AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> [...]
>> +struct clk *tegra_clk_register(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> + struct device *dev = NULL;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + const char *dev_name;
>> +
>> + np = tegra_clk_get_of_node(hw);
>> +
>> + if (!of_device_is_available(np))
>> + goto put_node;
>> +
>> + dev_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "tegra_clk_%s", hw->init->name);
>> + if (!dev_name)
>> + goto put_node;
>> +
>> + pdev = of_platform_device_create(np, dev_name, NULL);
>> + if (!pdev) {
>> + pr_err("%s: failed to create device for %pOF\n", __func__, np);
>> + kfree(dev_name);
>> + goto put_node;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>> +put_node:
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> +
>> + return clk_register(dev, hw);
>> +}
>
> This looks wrong. Why do we need struct platform_device objects for each
> of these clocks? That's going to be a massive amount of platform devices
> and they will completely mess up sysfs.
RPM works with a device. It's not a massive amount of devices, it's one
device for T20 and four devices for T30.
