bitmap_list_string() is very ineffective when printing bitmaps with long
ranges of set bits because it calls find_next_bit for each bit in the
bitmap. We can do better by detecting ranges of set bits.
In my environment, before/after is 943008/31008 ns.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
lib/vsprintf.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index dd006adfe853..29a384eee286 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -1241,20 +1241,13 @@ char *bitmap_list_string(char *buf, char *end, unsigned long *bitmap,
struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
{
int nr_bits = max_t(int, spec.field_width, 0);
- /* current bit is 'cur', most recently seen range is [rbot, rtop] */
- int cur, rbot, rtop;
bool first = true;
+ int rbot, rtop;
if (check_pointer(&buf, end, bitmap, spec))
return buf;
- rbot = cur = find_first_bit(bitmap, nr_bits);
- while (cur < nr_bits) {
- rtop = cur;
- cur = find_next_bit(bitmap, nr_bits, cur + 1);
- if (cur < nr_bits && cur <= rtop + 1)
- continue;
-
+ for_each_set_bitrange(rbot, rtop, bitmap, nr_bits) {
if (!first) {
if (buf < end)
*buf = ',';
@@ -1263,15 +1256,12 @@ char *bitmap_list_string(char *buf, char *end, unsigned long *bitmap,
first = false;
buf = number(buf, end, rbot, default_dec_spec);
- if (rbot < rtop) {
- if (buf < end)
- *buf = '-';
- buf++;
-
- buf = number(buf, end, rtop, default_dec_spec);
- }
+ if (rtop == rbot + 1)
+ continue;
- rbot = cur;
+ if (buf < end)
+ *buf = '-';
+ buf = number(++buf, end, rtop - 1, default_dec_spec);
}
return buf;
}
--
2.30.2
