Hi Wolfram-san,
> From: Wolfram Sang, Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 1:42 PM
>
> Hi Shimoda-san,
>
> thank you for taking care of this!
Thank you for your review!
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I think this Rep-by can go. Test bot mentioned one build error of v1,
> but it didn't report that we should refactor this code.
You're correct. Perhaps, adding "# build fix on RFC" is better?
I checked the commit history, and I found such tags.
> > -- should I make step-by-step patches to ease review?
>
> I'd think this is good enough.
I got it.
> > -- should I rename the current renesas_sdhi_of_data (e.g. renesas_sdhi_param)?
> > (renesas_sdhi_of_data and renesas_sdhi_of_data_with_quirks seem strange
> > a little?)
>
> Yes, this may be a little better. I'd think the current naming is good
> enough, though.
I got it.
> > - I tested this patch on r8a77951 (ES3.0), r8a77960 (ES1.0) and r8a77965.
>
> I also tested this on r8a77965.
Thanks!
> > - Also I tested this patch on r8a7791 [2].
>
> I'll check r8a7790 later.
Thanks!
> > static const struct renesas_sdhi_quirks sdhi_quirks_r8a7796_es13 = {
> > .hs400_4taps = true,
> > .hs400_bad_taps = BIT(2) | BIT(3) | BIT(6) | BIT(7),
> > .hs400_calib_table = r8a7796_es13_calib_table,
> > };
>
> You leave the quirk handling of different ES versions still in
> renesas_sdhi_core. I'd think this should also be moved to
> renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac? Then we have all the handling in one place.
I think so. So, I'll try this.
> > +static const struct renesas_sdhi_of_data_with_quirks of_r8a7795_compatible = {
> > + .of_data = &of_data_rcar_gen3,
> > + .quirks = &sdhi_quirks_bad_taps2367,
> > +};
>
> I'd suggest only a single space (and not a tabulator) before the "=".
I got it.
> Rest looks good so far!
Thank you for your review!
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
